Site with information about the impacts of large monocultures, specifically soy, on people's lives and the environment.
The Soy Campaign
A SEED's soy campaign questions large scale soy production in South America and supports sustainable and local food production in Europe. The campaign has the following goals:
To inform the general public about the social and ecological effects of the massive soy production in Latin America; land conflicts, violence, rising pesticide use, GMOs, deforestation, erosion and loss of food sovereignty.
To link the issue with meat production and consumption in Europe; Most of the soy is used as animal feed in Europe (and China). This meat industry creates animal cruelty and pollution by over-fertilisation.
To stop the current certification processes; nature conservation organisations and some NGOs, together with companies, are creating criteria for so called 'responsible soy' that are unacceptable for local peasants and don't question the current export-volume neither the use of genetically manipulated seeds.
To give direct support to local initiatives that fight the soy expansion by giving international attention to their struggle, doing solidarity actions in Europe and raising money.
While the problems related to soy production are continuously increasing, a new campaign focus is taking shape: fuel and electricity produced from agriculture products. Recently the threat of climate change and the increasing scarcity of fossil fuels has sped up this alarming development.
It is best to visit this website with Firefox or another open source browser. The use of Micro$oft Internet Explorer is for your own risk and when you do, it is possible that the site will not look the way it is meant to do.
Agrofools hit the road during Social Forum in Malmö
Monday, 22 September 2008
Protesters at petrol stations state "Agrofuels are no solution for the climate and energy problem!"
Malmö, Saturday 20 September 2008 - During the European Social Forum (ESF) about 50 people protested against the introduction of the large scale production of agrofuels. The devastating social and environmental consequences of the production of energy crops was a big issue in the presentations and discussions inside the ESF. The Agrofools decided that it was important to reach the people in the streets as well, and to explain that we have to choose between food and fuel.
In Front of a Statoil petrol station (Nobelvägan near corner Lönngatan) the traffic was stopped and waiters and waitresses serving organic food talked to the drivers. They had to choose between fuelling their car, or access to food for themselves and other people. There was understanding and sympathy for the alternative, although nobody decided to leave the car at the spot. Luckily the police was occupied by their preparations for the big ESF demonstration. It took them 30 minutes to find out about the action. Just when the activists decided to move on to the next stop, three vans arrived. But just before the groups arrived at the a Shell station (corner Lönngatan and Lantmannagatan) the cops lost interest and left. This gave the group the opportunity to put a line around this unguarded station and leave the message "Closed due to climate change and human rights violations." The action was done by about 50 people from Via Campesina, young Friends of the Earth, A SEED, Corporate Europe Observatory and individual activists.
Background information
The European push for agrofuels is going to have many social and environmental implications. Rising food prices jeopardise people´s food sovereignty and access to food.
Sweden is one of the EU member states most in favour of using more agrofuels, especially sugarcane ethanol from Brazil. This year, the Swedish government asked the EU to allow imports of sugarcane ethanol from Brazil with lowered trade barriers.
Oil companies like Statoil are keen to get a share out of the new agrofuel business. Statoil signed a deal with Brazilian oil company Petrobras aimed at jointly expanding exploration, sub-sea and agrofuel production.
Many other Scandinavian companies are involved on agrofuels. Swedish company SEKAB has started large scale sugarcane production in Tanzania to fuel Swedish cars with ethanol. German newspaper Spiegel reported that thousands of residents are being forced to move to make way for Sekab's plans, on at least 9,000 hectares. Five thousand hectares have already been approved but Sekab wants to expand to 50,000 hectares.
SEKAB will compete with the local population for the water available in the river and wetlands, especially in the dry season. Residents complained about complete lack of information or compensation given.
SEKAB pretends to be sourcing 'certified sustainable' ethanol from Brazil, and has established its own criteria for this. However, these sustainability guarantees do nothing to stop the expansion of monoculture plantations in Brazil, with both direct and indirect impacts.
Scandinavian cellulose companies are keen to profit as well, especially from the so-called ´second-generation´ agrofuels. They misleadingly claim that the tree monocultures needed to provide the cellulose will not compete with food production.
Social and ecological consequences of agrofuels (three out of many)
1. Agrofuels are competing with food: The current food crisis is telling. Within a few month, the price of rice has increased with about 100 % and the price of grains by 130% in 2007. One of the effects being food riots in many countries.
2. Large scale production of agrofuels is not environmentally friendly at all: as it extends monocultural cultivation, the use of human and environmentally polluting pesticides, the over-use of the soil, the loss of biodiversity and the use of genetic modification.
3. Small scale farmers loose their land and resources: as large scale agriculture is led by a relatively small number of large scale farmers and foreign companies. With small scale agriculture 40 families could sustain their livelihoods on a surface of 200 hectares. Large scale soja production, however, only needs one labourer for the same acreage.
For more information: http://www.aseed.net/soy - http://www.regenwald.org - http://www.lasojamata.org - http://viacampesina.org - http://www.biofuelwatch.org
Many car drivers still want both food and fuel
First an honest answers, and then you can continue
A bit of posing with the banners
Closed because of climate change and human rights violations
An easy choice, isn't it?
A closed and empty petrol station after the activists left for the general ESF demonstration
Last Updated ( Monday, 22 September 2008 )
Use and spread the info, but it would be kind if you let us know about it.
This site uses Joomla!, Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
Soy 
Protesters at petrol stations state "Agrofuels are no solution for the climate and energy problem!"
